Bon, je vais essayer d'être plus positif pour me faire pardonner.
voilà ce que j'ai trouvé:
http://jeanphilippe.dudziak.9online.fr/fos...s/crustaces.htm
Pycnolepas orientalis Kolosváry, 1966 (nomen dubium)Original description. Kolosváry (1966: 130, text-fig. 2).Type. Not indicated; current whereabouts of material unknown.Locality and stratigraphy. Kuznataj (= River Kuzna-chaj, Azerbaijan); Upper Cretaceous (exact levelnot specified).Remarks. The type lot (collected 1958; leg. V.G. Nikitin) of this form consists of isolated capitularvalves; Kolosváry referred to these as scutum, carina, carinolaterale, tergum, rostrum and supralaterale. Asnoted by Collins (1980: 21), the ‘scutum’ in Kolosváry’s fig. 2a clearly is a tergum, while the ‘tergum’ of hisfig. 2d is a scutum; that this was intentional can be seen from the description and reconstruction of the capitu-lum (Kolosváry, 1966: fig. 7). Kolosváry failed to explain why this form should have had three pairs of lateralvalves, while the genus Pycnolepas has a single pair (see Withers, 1914, 1935). Alekseev (1979: 17) clarifiedthe provenance of the material by noting that (translated), ‘In the same year, G. Koloshvary (Kolosvary, 1966)based on material from Caucasus, received from O.S. Vialov, briefly described the new species Pycnolepasorientalis (Azerbaijan, River Kuzna-chaj, Upper Cretaceous) and the new subspecies Zeugmatolepas mockleriarmenicus (Armenia, Maastrichtian), without pictures giving only schematic drawings’. We consider it best totreat P. orientalis as a nomen dubium until the types are traced, or new material is collected, so as to allow aproper interpretation of this form. Occurrence. Known only from the type area; no subsequent records.
in: http://www.kbios.uni.opole.pl/biblioteka/docs/pycnolepas.pdf
Mais je suppose que tu les avais déjà trouvé.
Amicalement, Serge